ADV ANUPAM KUMAR MISHRA

  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before: - G.S. Singhvi & V. Gopala Gowda, JJ. I.S. Sikandar (D) By Lrs. – Appellant Versus K. Subramani and others – Respondent Facts: Plaintiff had entered into an agreement with defendants for sale of the suit property in his favour for consideration of L 45,000/-. A sum of L 5000/- was paid towards part sale consideration to the defendants and they delivered original title deeds and put the plaintiff in physical possession of the suit schedule property. They had agreed to receive the balance sale consideration amount of L 40,000/- at the time of registration of the sale deed to be executed in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff that on being put in possession of the suit property, he erected cattle shed to tether cattle and paid betterment charges to the concerned authorities. He also secured change of khata and paid the property taxes. Plaintiff requested the vendors to execute the deed of conveyance in his favour. The vendors declined to accede to h

  The Honorable Supreme Court held that an arbitral award cannot be set aside merely on the grounds of erroneous application of law or misappreciation of evidence.   The Supreme Court ruled that apart from grounds mentioned in section 34 (2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, an arbitrary award can be set aside only when it is vitiated by the patent illegality and not on the ground of an erroneous application of the law or by misappreciation of the evidence.   The Bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Sanjiv Khannamade the ruling while allowing an appeal that challenge a Punjab & Haryana High Court judgment that had affirmed an order passed by the District Judge wherein it was ruled that the application u/s 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act was inter alia was barred by limitation        Case  :  Haryana Urban Development V. Mehta Construction Company And Another, (SC) 348, 2022                Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34 (2)(a) - Arbitral award ca

  PROTECTION OF THE DARJEELING TEA UNDER GI SUBMITTED BY- KOMALPREET KAUR MAIL ID-  komalwork0512@gmail.com WHAT IS GI? “ On September 15, 2003, India, as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), ratified the Geographical Indication Act. Geographical Indication, often known as GI Tags, is an intellectual property right granted on a product that originates from a specific geographic place and possesses intrinsic or reputed features. GI Tags are issued in India by the Geographical Indication Registry, which is part of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry's Department of Industry Promotion and Internal Trade. ” “ Sellers are allowed to manufacture and sell products with a specific location. GI is defined by the GI Act as goods and services that originated or were generated in a specified jurisdiction. Darjeeling tea was the first commodity in India to be labelled with a Geographical Indicator (GI) in 2004-2005. Since 2020, 370 goods in India have been assigned the GI label. Ge

  ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla AIR, 1976   Criminal Appeal No. 279 of 1975 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR                                       ……Appellant Versus SHIVKANT SHUKLA                                                                                           ……Respondent   Criminal Appeal Nos. 355 and 356 of 1975 STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                                ……Appellant Versus V. K. S. CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS                                                               ……Respondent   Criminal Appeal Nos.1845-1849 of 1975 UNION OF INDIA                                                                                                    ……Appellant Versus ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE AND OTHERS                                                        ……Respondent   Criminal Appeal No. 1926 of 1975 STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS                                                            …… Appellant Versus N. K. GANPAIAH AND